A score is not an implementation plan.
Developers need the failing URL, observed response, likely owning layer, safe change boundary, and a test that proves the correction.
Find the blocking dependency before polishing content or adding another monitoring tool.
Turn verified evidence into a bounded developer task and retest it after deployment.
Open the Developer Workspace
A developer SEO, AEO, and GEO checker should run in layers: SEO checks public response, redirects, canonical, robots directives, sitemap, rendering, metadata, internal links, structured data, and performance evidence; AEO checks whether pages answer real questions directly with clear structure and visible support; GEO checks entity clarity, source quality, citations and limitations, topical relationships, and AI crawler policy. The output should preserve evidence, map findings to code or configuration, protect private routes, and require production retesting.
This combined checker uses one workspace but keeps SEO eligibility, answer quality, generative source readiness, and measured outcomes as distinct result sections.
Developers need the failing URL, observed response, likely owning layer, safe change boundary, and a test that proves the correction.
Crawlability, indexing, search performance, AI crawler traffic, citations, referrals, and conversions are related but not interchangeable measurements.
Audit, AI visibility, research, content optimization, and reporting-organized around the website you are improving.
Third-party names and logos are trademarks of their owners and are shown for comparison. Other-tool prices are illustrative monthly benchmarks; exact plans and costs may vary.
Inspect the live system, change the smallest owning component, and repeat the same production test.
The SEO layer establishes eligibility and consistency. Test the exact public URL, redirect chain, status, robots controls, canonical, sitemap membership, initial and rendered content, headings, internal links, metadata, supported schema, errors, mobile behavior, and performance evidence. A failure here can prevent later content improvements from being discoverable.
The AEO layer evaluates whether a visitor or answer system can extract a concise useful response. Check question alignment, direct answers, descriptive headings, lists or tables where appropriate, definitions, examples, qualifiers, and visible evidence. Do not manufacture FAQ schema for questions that are absent from the page.
The GEO layer evaluates the page as a potential source: clear entities and relationships, original detail, named methodology, dates, primary citations, limitations, comparison criteria, author or organization context, and links to supporting pages. It can also record AI crawler access, but an allowed crawler does not prove a later citation.
The handoff layer turns the highest dependency into a task. Include route and environment, observed evidence, likely owner, files to inspect, protected surfaces, required tests, and the exact production acceptance condition. Avoid bulk automated rewrites across unrelated pages.
Map every finding to an owner before editing. Metadata and structured data may belong to a layout or route; redirects and headers may belong to the server or edge; sitemap and robots output may be generated; content may live in a CMS; AI visibility observations and Search Console data belong to separate reporting systems. Preserve the plain architecture of the project instead of installing a new framework for one fix.
Protect the application boundary. Public marketing, documentation, pricing, use-case, support, and policy pages can be discovery targets. Account, dashboard, billing, checkout, API, webhook, preview, staging, admin, and user-data routes should remain authenticated or otherwise protected and should not enter public sitemaps, llms.txt inventories, or generated content feeds.
Verify in dependency order: public response and redirects, robots directives, canonical and sitemap, source and rendered content, metadata, internal links, structured data, performance evidence, then indexing and visibility reports. Record the before state, deploy one bounded correction, run the same test, and annotate the release. No tool can guarantee indexing, ranking, citation, or traffic.
They can share a summary, but the underlying checks and evidence should remain visible and separate.
Fix public access, response, canonical, and indexability dependencies before content polish.
No. It shows stronger observable readiness, while platforms control selection and citations.